The subject AI regulation news 2025 has dominated debates around the world. As artificial intelligence advances and starts to be used in important sectors of society, ranging from health, safety, and even justice, the need to establish rules for its use also grows.
Anúncios
The year 2025 is already highlighted by important decisions in various parts of the world: from the European Union to the United States, including China, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom, each government has adopted its own measures to regulate AI and today it will know each of these measures.
We will demonstrate the main AI regulation news 2025, making you understand how each country has shaped its policies. In addition to having a broad notion of what the most common challenges are, and what these decisions mean for the future of technology and society.
Does AI need to be regulated?
Yes, artificial intelligence needs to be regulated — and this urgency is already recognized by several international institutions, including the UN itself.
The warning made by Secretary-General António Guterres at the end of 2024 shows the risks of a powerful technology that, if misused, can compromise even the democratic rule of law.
In addition to stimulating disinformation and intensifying social polarization through tools such as deepfakes and opaque algorithms.
Artificial intelligence advances at such a great speed that it has surpassed any other technology created to date. That is why it has been affecting the whole world.
Anúncios
Furthermore, it cannot be denied that its benefits are great, but there is also great concern.
So the question is no longer “if” AI needs regulation, but “how” and “who” should lead this process, before technology dictates the rules on its own.
Anúncios
How has each nation dealt with AI regulation?
We will address the policies adopted in each of the main countries of the world economy. Let’s go!
1. Europe (AI Regulation News 2025)
The European Union reinforced its commitment to the ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence through two relevant publications made this year.
The first, led by the European Commission, updates the guidelines for the responsible use of AI in scientific research.
Second from the European Data Protection Board, delves into the risks and mitigation measures related to large language models (LLMs).
In principle, the new European Commission guidelines, aimed at researchers, scientific organizations and funding bodies, establish four central principles, namely:
- Reliability
- Honesty;
- Respect;
- Responsibility.
These fundamentals come from the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and guide transparency in the use of technology.
As a rule, it is recommended that researchers use AI consciously, ensuring privacy and copyright. Institutions, on the other hand, must follow the evolution of systems and foster an ethical culture of innovation.
In addition to this, the European Data Protection Board report brings a more technical and preventive approach, focused on privacy risks.
The document details how these technologies work, defines responsibilities based on the EU AI Law and the GDPR.
Above all, they warn that the implementation of strict data protection policies. In addition to the regular conduct of risk analyses. Strengthening transparency in the processes of collecting and using information, correcting algorithmic biases, and active oversight by humans.
In this way, the European Union reaffirms its position as a global reference in AI regulation. Seeking to balance scientific innovation with social responsibility, protection of fundamental rights, and preservation of public trust.
2. United Kingdom
The United Kingdom has once again put the debate on the regulation of artificial intelligence on the agenda with the resubmission of the Private Members’ Bill on AI to Parliament, on March 4, 2025.
The proposal, which had been introduced in November 2023 without significant progress. Has now passed the first reading in the House of Lords. Leading to strong discussions about the role of technology and the limits of its performance.
Among the central points of the project, the creation of an “AI Authority” stands out, responsible for overseeing the application and regulatory development of artificial intelligence in the country.
Another key element of the project is the requirement that companies involved with AI appoint a person responsible for ensuring safety in the application of the technology.
The proposal also provides for the creation of mechanisms for active listening to the population. With continuous public engagement programs on the risks and benefits of AI.
Above all, more than creating immediate legislation, the project can serve as a starting point to shape the British government’s official policy regarding AI regulation, promoting broader debates and preparing the ground for future standards.
3. USA (AI Regulation News 2025)
The United States has adopted a more assertive and coordinated strategy for the use of artificial intelligence in public administration.
On April 7, 2025, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published two memos that guide how federal agencies should acquire and utilize AI technologies. All done through Memorandum M-25-21, focused on the strategic use of AI, and Memorandum M-25-22, focused on its efficient acquisition.
The first document, entitled “Accelerating the Federal Use of AI through Innovation, Governance, and Public Trust,” promotes a clear policy to encourage the adoption of AI in the activities of the Executive Branch.
It mandates that all agencies appoint an AI Director responsible for overseeing the implementation of intelligent systems. Removing bureaucratic obstacles. Thus fostering a culture of continuous innovation.
The second memorandum, “Boosting the efficient acquisition of artificial intelligence in government”, defines strict guidelines for the contracting of AI solutions to be done based on transparency, cost-effectiveness, and respect for civil rights and citizens’ privacy.
Both texts represent a significant advance in federal policy regarding AI, by adopting a pro-innovation and pro-competition stance.
This is a departure from the more cautious approach of the recent past.
Now, the federal government is betting on a more progressive mindset, focusing on efficiency, modernization of public services, and consolidation of the United States’ leadership in the global technology scenario.
Conclusion
The main AI regulation news 2025 show that the world is moving in a coordinated way to establish clear rules on the use of artificial intelligence.
In a scenario where technology advances faster than the law, the actions of countries such as the USA, the United Arab Emirates and the European Union reinforce the urgency of regulating the technology.
Each nation has followed different paths, but with one goal, to align innovation with fundamental rights. And it is this balance that will define the impact of AI over the next decade.